Chapter 1: The Concept of a Simulated Reality

Is it conceivable that our existence is merely a simulation? This thought-provoking question arises from a reader's inquiry:

"Hello! I have been following your channel for some time and truly enjoy it. Thank you! I have a question: There's a theory suggesting our world operates as a computer simulation. This theory purportedly elucidates phenomena like the tunneling effect, the speed of light limitations, and particle-wave duality. What are your thoughts on this theory, and how does dark matter fit into the discussion?"

The roots of the simulation hypothesis can be traced back to ancient philosophical thought, long before the advent of modern computing. Notably, early Greek philosophers such as Pythagoras, Aristotle, and Plato emphasized the supremacy of ideas over physical matter.

Pythagoras

As information technology evolved in the 20th century, the notion of a simulated reality gained traction. By the early 1990s, it permeated popular culture, notably championed by Swedish philosopher Nick Bostrom, a prominent advocate of the computer simulation hypothesis.

Nick Bostrom. Photo from his Facebook page

Bostrom posits that any advanced civilization, during its progression, will design numerous computer simulations and virtual realities. Our own society has embarked on this journey, creating increasingly intricate video games. This leads to the idea that most conscious beings exist not in the tangible world, but rather within these constructed simulations. Consequently, Bostrom theorizes that we are likely inhabitants of one such simulation.

Screenshot from the computer game GTA 5

Over time, beyond philosophical discourse, various scientific arguments have emerged that bolster this hypothesis, leading to its evolution. In contemporary contexts, our universe is viewed as a computer simulation akin to modern video games, albeit far more intricate. Some physicists have embraced this hypothesis as it adeptly addresses unresolved issues in contemporary physics, interpreting them as simplified algorithms executed by the hypothetical simulation.

For instance, the well-known particle-wave duality can be likened to the graphics employed in gaming. When a character is distanced from an object, a simplified model is utilized, lacking intricate details and displaying blurry textures. This method minimizes the computational burden on the system. However, as one approaches the object, the system switches to a complete model, revealing detailed graphics.

In a similar vein, the simulation hypothesis suggests that the microcosm operates using simplified models: particles exhibit wave characteristics when unobserved. Once observation begins, the full computational model activates, showcasing detailed particle-like visuals. This framework clarifies both particle-wave duality and quantum uncertainty.

Quantum entanglement illustrated

Additionally, the simulation hypothesis offers a compelling explanation for quantum entanglement, wherein multiple particles maintain interconnected states; an action on one particle instantaneously influences the others, irrespective of spatial separation. Recent experiments have indicated that this "interaction" occurs at least 100,000 times faster than light (the sensitivity threshold of the measuring instruments). Theoretically, these changes are transmitted instantaneously, contradicting relativity's assertion that light is the ultimate speed limit. The simulation hypothesis accounts for this by suggesting that signals within the simulation don't traverse vast distances; rather, all entangled particles are computed in close proximity, altering their properties simultaneously without the constraints of speed in our universe.

The simulation hypothesis can theoretically encompass a wide array of phenomena, yet it also introduces numerous challenges. A significant issue is that all known computational technology, regardless of its complexity, fundamentally relies on quantum mechanical principles. Thus, creating a computer and an elaborate simulation purely based on classical physics proves impossible. This implies either the simulation operates under entirely distinct physical laws—raising new questions about their nature—or the simulation adheres to the same laws as ours, leaving existing physical enigmas unresolved while merely complicating the simulation hypothesis.

While I concede that the simulation hypothesis may hold some validity, I personally do not endorse it. I believe humanity lacks the capacity to confirm or refute it conclusively.

If you're interested in more articles about space, give us a clap!

Subscribe to our channel and pose your questions, which I will address in future articles. If you appreciate my work, consider supporting me by becoming a member of Medium for just $5 a month, helping us create even better content.

Chapter 2: Understanding the Simulation Hypothesis

The first video titled "You are a Simulation & Physics Can Prove It: George Smoot at TEDxSalford" provides an insightful exploration into the implications of the simulation hypothesis in relation to physics.

The second video, "New Evidence We Live in a Simulation ACTUALLY Points to Something Else!" discusses recent findings that challenge conventional understanding of the simulation hypothesis, offering fresh perspectives on reality.