Step One: Candidness in Experience and Perception

How should we analyze UFO sightings if we aim to uncover the truth? One striking aspect of UFO encounters is their anthropocentric nature. While the topic may superficially concern extraterrestrial life, it fundamentally revolves around human self-perception. People's assumptions, emotions, and understanding significantly influence their interpretations of what they witness. Furthermore, there exists a tendency to view humanity as the standard for all things—an anthropomorphic bias.

To transcend anthropocentrism, we must scrutinize human behavior. UFO sightings are predominantly experienced by people (with only a few captured by automated cameras), yet every sighting is filtered through human interpretation. Ultimately, every UFO encounter is a human experience. I do not intend to imply that UFO sightings lack validity; rather, the ambiguous nature of these phenomena leads individuals to fill in the gaps with their interpretations.

Our perceptions are shaped by our knowledge, which is a dynamic interplay of past experiences and present expectations. The philosophical concept of "semantic resources" suggests that we need to acquire terminology and concepts to articulate our experiences meaningfully. This notion is particularly relevant in unpacking UFO phenomena.

Many observers have noted that people's experiences and thoughts about UFOs evolve in response to current events. For instance, around 120 years ago, sightings were described as dirigibles due to the technology familiar to observers at the time. As technology advances, so too does the language and understanding surrounding these phenomena.

Cinematic narratives have also influenced public interpretation. The film The Day the Earth Stood Still (1951) shaped U.S. perceptions of UFOs as surveillance by extraterrestrials concerned about nuclear weapons. It exemplifies a hubristic belief that advanced extraterrestrial civilizations would take interest in humanity, particularly in relation to our weapons. This mindset, rooted in Cold War ideology, persists in contemporary discussions about UFOs.

This anthropocentric bias extends to the assumption that aliens would resemble us. Carl Sagan suggested that extraterrestrial life forms would defy our imagination. However, many continue to envision aliens as variations of humans, differing only in size or color, and exhibiting similar behaviors—whether more sinister or benevolent, depending on personal biases.

It is natural to interpret unknown aerial phenomena through the lens of our existing knowledge. "That looks like an advanced aircraft; it must be an alien spacecraft." Yet, we lack a definitive understanding of what extraterrestrials might look like, how they think, or how they would behave if they visited Earth. To begin grasping UFO phenomena, we must discard our preconceptions and look at them objectively.

Nevertheless, human experience complicates our understanding. Different individuals witness and interpret phenomena in unique ways. I often pose the question to my philosophy students: "How many trees are outside the window?" They might respond with "one," but I argue there are as many trees as there are people in the room, as each of us experiences reality differently.

What do individuals actually experience during a UFO sighting? A myriad of interpretations arises from various experiences. We should assess the tangible aspects of UFO encounters, considering not only whether witnesses observe familiar or unexplainable phenomena but also the psychological dimensions influencing their interpretations. How much of what they report stems from external stimuli versus personal perceptions and psychological needs? It's essential to recognize that some individuals may seek attention, but acknowledging this does not imply a judgment of their experiences.

We all interpret our experiences, often tailoring them to our desires. There is no singular, privileged perspective—only individual viewpoints. Each case should be examined critically, yet with an open mind to the narratives shared by witnesses. Perhaps we will discover how cultural lore shapes personal accounts, including outlandish tales. Alternatively, we may uncover instances of individuals fabricating stories for attention. Each experience warrants careful consideration, evaluating both physical and psychological evidence.

Some witnesses approach encounters without ulterior motives, simply grappling with what they observe in the sky. UFOs represent real events, and sightings arise from a set of objective phenomena. The challenge lies in the variable subjectivity of these experiences compared to other phenomena.

A genuine investigation requires an impartial stance, balancing skepticism with openness to the possibility of extraterrestrial involvement. By collectively engaging in a thoughtful exploration of UFO phenomena, we can establish a framework for understanding the underlying factors behind sightings and the diverse reactions they elicit. The outcome of such inquiries remains uncertain, yet the pursuit is undoubtedly worthwhile.

Step Two: Moving Beyond Cold War Narratives

My observations primarily pertain to the United States, as other societies harbor distinct experiences and attitudes.

From the robotic sentinel in The Day the Earth Stood Still to the Pentagon's rebranding of UFOs as UAPs, Cold War narratives have pervaded perceptions of these phenomena. The UFO-centric films of the 1950s often served as allegories for American fears regarding a Soviet invasion and the potential onset of World War III. Conversely, The Day the Earth Stood Still presented a narrative in which extraterrestrials monitor humanity, intervening to prevent global conflict. These opposing themes have significantly influenced public interpretations of UFO sightings.

A constant in both narratives, as well as much fiction about extraterrestrial visitors, is the overwhelming presence of the military. The U.S. military ostensibly exists to safeguard the nation from invasion. During the Cold War, the perceived threat posed by the Soviets legitimized a heightened military presence, arguably surpassing that of World War II. American society was steeped in paranoia regarding potential Soviet incursions.

Consequently, sightings in the sky became a matter of national security—these aerial phenomena could be Soviet in origin. This led to two prevailing notions: that UFOs serve as transport for potential threats, and that military action is warranted regarding these unidentified crafts. Fictional portrayals perpetuated this synergy, solidifying the belief that UFOs represent a military issue. This perception continues to obstruct clear understanding of UFOs and UAPs today, particularly in relation to the enduring Disclosure narrative.

The Disclosure Narrative: A Product of Cold War Ideology

Military operations necessitate a degree of secrecy, and during the Cold War, the emphasis on operational security reached unprecedented levels. Paranoia was rampant.

This era fostered the intertwining of several concepts:

1. We are under threat.
2. The military is tasked with our protection.
3. The military must maintain secrecy.

These ideas logically culminated in the belief that:

• The military is concealing information regarding UFO threats.

This notion may seem reasonable at first glance, but what evidence supports it?

The belief that the military and government possess knowledge that remains hidden from the public stems from a mindset prevalent in the 1950s. Historical newsreels from that time illustrate this perspective. The prevailing view of government as an omnipotent, benevolent patriarch shaped public consciousness. The U.S. had emerged victorious from the war, projecting itself as a defender of freedom and justice.

Given this context, it was only natural for citizens to assume that the military, as the guardian of national security, would be privy to information about any potential extraterrestrial threats.

In the early 1960s, questioning the government was deemed unpatriotic—an association with communism. However, by the mid-1970s, perspectives shifted significantly. The aftermath of the Vietnam War and the Watergate scandal fostered skepticism regarding the government's integrity, leading many to view it as a potential force for harm rather than a protector of freedom.

Simultaneously, UFO sightings surged, prompting questions about governmental knowledge. The prevailing sentiment transitioned from assuming the military's superior awareness to demanding transparency regarding what they knew about UFOs.

Thus, the Disclosure narrative began to take shape. To fill the information void surrounding UFO phenomena, a narrative emerged, driven by individuals selling books and theories about extraterrestrial encounters. The core assertion of the Disclosure narrative suggests that the military has long been aware of UFOs as extraterrestrial vehicles but is withholding this information from the public. Variants of this narrative range from tales of crashed saucers and hybrid breeding programs to claims of secret space fleets.

The military and government, whether intentionally or not, have inadvertently fueled this growing narrative. Project Blue Book epitomized government misdirection, with many of its findings appearing absurd and dismissive of witnesses. If the goal of Blue Book was to clarify UFO sightings, it ultimately achieved the opposite, fostering the impression of a cover-up. The project concluded in 1969, and the military fell silent. Why?

A More Likely Hypothesis than the Disclosure Narrative

While I can understand why some believe the military and government are withholding UFO-related information, I criticize those who fail to engage in critical thinking regarding their motivations. A prudent individual evaluates evidence and adjusts their beliefs accordingly. Let us examine the plausibility of the Disclosure narrative.

The Disclosure hypothesis posits that the U.S. military has concealed knowledge of extraterrestrial spacecraft visiting Earth for up to 75 years. Upholding this hypothesis requires the belief that the military possesses exceptional capabilities to maintain secrecy, even silencing countless individuals.

A more pressing concern is that proponents of the Disclosure narrative must also explain why the military would go to such lengths to conceal an extraterrestrial presence. To explore this, let us consider the military's motivations.

It is fair to assert that the U.S. military and its political allies have leveraged public fears of foreign threats to their advantage. If no threats existed, there would be no justification for military funding. The military has demonstrated a willingness to assert evidence of foreign threats, even when that evidence is fabricated. If they were aware of an extraterrestrial threat, they would likely exploit it to bolster their authority, just as they do with every real or perceived danger.

A more plausible hypothesis suggests that the military and government lack definitive knowledge regarding UFOs and are aware of their ignorance concerning these phenomena. Let us use a thought experiment to illustrate this point.

Imagine you hold a position of authority within the military or government responsible for overseeing national security. You believe, with good reason, that the public regards you as the defender of freedom. As part of the most powerful military in history, it is essential to maintain the perception of being capable of addressing all foreign threats.

Now, you receive a report detailing UFO sightings. Experts inform you that the phenomena remain unexplained. They cannot ascertain whether the phenomena pose a threat to national security. Faced with this information, what course of action do you take?

If you were to assert, "I will be honest with the American people; there are unexplainable aerial phenomena," you would be perceived as naive. Your responsibility is to uphold the perception that the military can manage any foreign threat. Admitting that the military may not understand these phenomena could jeopardize national security.

Furthermore, as a military official, you are trained to prioritize operational security. You did not achieve your position by admitting ignorance. What would you do? Out of embarrassment and a desire to maintain the military's reputation, you might choose to file the report away, allowing it to be forgotten.

The military and government may not be concealing knowledge about UFOs; instead, they may be guarding their lack of understanding. This hypothesis aligns more closely with the military's historical behavior and is far easier to maintain.

Step Two: Moving Beyond Cold War Narratives (Continued)

As previously noted, the Cold War instilled the notion that UFOs are vehicles of transportation. While the belief that aerial phenomena represent vehicles predates the Cold War, the prevailing paranoia of the era fueled the notion that UFOs were surveillance crafts. The public was acutely aware of Soviet espionage, and this fear easily transferred to UFOs. The film industry mirrored these anxieties by depicting UFOs as interplanetary vessels carrying soldiers or monsters. The Day the Earth Stood Still offered a more benevolent interpretation, suggesting aliens were monitoring humanity.

Regardless of whether individuals envisioned divine judges, soldiers, or monsters aboard these spacecraft, such interpretations reflected the 1950s fixation on paranoia and technology. While UFOs could indeed be extraterrestrial crafts, that is not the sole possibility. It has merely become the dominant assumption among Americans since the Cold War.

Why must we move beyond the alien spacecraft assumption (ASA)? Investigations are often hindered by preconceived notions, as assumed conclusions obstruct objective evaluations of available evidence. In the case of UFOs, the ASA not only stifles research; it fills the gaps in UFO sightings with unfounded speculation and conspiracy theories.

The ASA dominates discussions surrounding UFOs, leading many to equate the question "Is that a UFO?" with "Is that an alien spacecraft?" Even recent investigations, such as AATIP, have approached UAPs with the presumption that they are aircraft, skewing interpretations to fit that narrative. Rumors are often spun to conform to the ASA, resulting in elaborate scenarios regarding crashed alien crafts based on scant evidence.

However, the ASA is not the sole factor corrupting UFO research. It intertwines with the militaristic perspective shaped by Cold War ideologies, suggesting that sightings involve spacecraft and that the military is concealing knowledge of these crafts.

This confluence of the ASA and the Disclosure narrative has stifled genuine inquiry into UFO phenomena. Within UFOlogy, one must either accept the Disclosure narrative or be labeled as complicit in a government cover-up. Exploring alternative perspectives or questioning established orthodoxies is often discouraged.

Ultimately, the assumption that UFOs and UAPs are extraterrestrial vessels is more myth than reality. It represents a human projection, presuming that these phenomena are piloted by beings resembling humans, albeit in different forms.

UFOs could represent a multitude of possibilities, including:

• Weather or energy phenomena
• Biological organisms
• Extra/ultra/alternative/multi-dimensional entities indigenous to our environment, yet imperceptible to us
• Consciousness-manipulating phenomena that shape our perceptions
• Other phenomena beyond our current comprehension

Those who view UFOs through the lens of the ASA and Disclosure narrative are less likely to consider these diverse possibilities, even in the absence of substantial evidence.

Summary: The Need for Honest Inquiry into UFO Experiences

We are left with a fascinating array of credible UFO sightings, yet the information available is often co-opted. On one hand, the narrative is hijacked by sensationalists and conspiracy theorists promoting the ASA or more extravagant ideas. Fueled by fantastical thinking, these narratives veer into the realm of absurdity. Conversely, skeptical debunkers engage in dismissive ridicule rather than thoughtful consideration, neglecting the weighty question of what underlies UFO sightings.

Who is genuinely investigating UFO phenomena? Is anyone?

The discourse surrounding UFOs is continually evolving, representing a dynamic interplay of concepts influenced by global events, technological advancements, and cultural trends. However, these swirling narratives obscure the actual phenomena and hinder a thorough examination of the complex inputs at play. Real occurrences transpire, but how can we achieve a clear understanding of them?

We require more evidence-based, reality-focused discussions about UFO phenomena. It is essential to gather and evaluate evidence, allowing it to guide our inquiries, regardless of how scant it may be.

Currently, there is no definitive proof that extraterrestrial life exists, let alone that such entities are visiting our planet. Consequently, there is no solid basis for claiming that the military is concealing knowledge of extraterrestrial encounters. Rather than indulging in fanciful thinking, a pragmatic assessment of the evidence suggests that any investigations conducted by the military have yielded no conclusive findings. This silence likely stems from embarrassment over their lack of knowledge rather than a cover-up.

In light of the evidence, we must conclude that the Disclosure narrative is speculative at best, more likely serving as an urban legend. This narrative assumes that, where there is speculation, there must be some underlying truth. In reality, there may be fog obscuring the truth, but there is no fire—meaning there is no credible evidence to support the notion that the government possesses greater knowledge about UFOs than the general public, much less any definitive proof of alien visitation. UFOs represent a genuine unexplained phenomenon, shrouded in ignorance, grifters, attention-seekers, and skeptics alike.

I advocate for a deeper exploration into the tangible aspects of UFO sightings. Numerous intriguing possibilities await discovery, and fostering an open-minded approach is crucial.

A deep dive into theories surrounding hidden aliens in a top-secret facility, exploring the implications of UFO sightings.

A comprehensive look at the top four UFO sightings from around the globe, investigating the evidence and public reactions.