Revolutionizing Chemistry: The Fall of Phlogiston Theory
Written on
Chapter 1: The Birth of Modern Chemistry
To usher in a new era for chemistry, a pivotal figure in the field had to make several groundbreaking contributions. For the sake of this discussion, initially titled "Smashing Phlogiston" (which sounds like a catchy 90s grunge band), let’s begin with a fundamental chemical equation:
H₂ + O₂ → H₂O
Don’t let this equation intimidate you — it’s simply the combination of hydrogen and oxygen to form water, which is the focal point of our narrative. However, before we delve into the significance of this reaction and the scientist who popularized it, it's essential to understand the historical context that made this reaction so critical.
Until the mid-18th century, chemistry didn’t have the same scientific stature as physics or mathematics. There was no equivalent of Isaac Newton in chemistry at that time. Some may argue that Robert Boyle could be considered a predecessor, but I believe he doesn’t quite fit that role. Consequently, chemistry was trapped in what can be described as a dark age.
Yet, hope was not lost. The advent of new analytical tools led to intriguing discoveries that contradicted established chemical beliefs. So, what were the prevailing ideas in chemistry during the mid-1700s? Unfortunately, they were largely unchanged from those of the past two millennia. Chemists still adhered to the four Aristotelian elements: earth, fire, air, and water.
While we may be missing "heart" to summon Captain Planet, this perspective illustrates the limited understanding of chemical knowledge at the time. As chemistry began to evolve, a rather peculiar concept arose: What exactly is phlogiston?
During the quest for enlightenment, early chemists replaced the classical element of fire with phlogiston. The term "phlogiston" originates from various Greek words related to fire. Essentially, chemists of the early 18th century substituted the classical fire element with this new term, which was essentially a similar concept. Phlogiston was viewed as an elusive substance responsible for fire, transferred from a material to the air during combustion.
The analysis conducted by 18th-century chemists went like this: When I burn a log, it contains phlogiston and earth. Upon burning, the phlogiston moves to the air, leaving behind only earth. They believed that if the log was burned in a confined space, the fire would extinguish because the air became saturated with phlogiston.
In modern terms, we know this to be nonsense; fire goes out in a closed environment because the oxygen is depleted. Despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, convincing early chemists to abandon the phlogiston theory was a significant challenge. Supporters of this theory were known as "phlogistonists," while their critics were labeled "anti-phlogistonists."
The Chemistry Rebel
The scientist who ultimately dismantled phlogiston theory was Antoine Lavoisier — a figure I affectionately refer to as the "Hugh Hefner of Chemistry." Why? Because he was a charismatic figure who hosted chemistry soirées filled with drinks and demonstrations.
Lavoisier possessed a unique advantage: substantial financial resources. He invested these into advancing the emerging field of chemistry. While I considered calling him the "Bruce Wayne of Chemistry," it didn’t quite fit since he didn’t have an alter ego fighting crime. Nevertheless, his wealth enabled him to acquire top-tier laboratory equipment and even establish a peer-reviewed journal to promote his theories and findings. His publications also allowed him to critique opposing research. Moreover, his lavish parties helped draw many chemists away from the phlogiston camp.
Tragically, Lavoisier fell victim to the nationalistic fervor that swept through France in the late 18th century, meeting a grim fate at the guillotine. Nonetheless, he made some of the most significant contributions to chemistry in history, often credited with bringing the field out of its dark age by dispelling the phlogiston myth.
The Chemical Reaction
The reaction of hydrogen and oxygen to produce water may appear straightforward, yet it was revolutionary for its time. In the 18th century, hydrogen and oxygen had just been discovered but were not recognized as elements; they were referred to as "dephlogisticated air" and "inflammable air," respectively.
Lavoisier and his colleagues began to assert that these gases were elemental substances that could not be further broken down. This was a bold claim at that time. He coined the term "oxygen" (from the French "oxygène") to promote the idea that phlogiston theory should be discarded. He demonstrated that the mass of hydrogen and oxygen equaled the mass of the resulting water, which was a groundbreaking revelation.
This was crucial, as proponents of phlogiston had claimed that it possessed mass, which accounted for the mass "lost" in the combustion reaction. However, Lavoisier pointed out that water was produced during these reactions, a fact that phlogistonists either overlooked or ignored. Faced with this evidence, they began to waver, claiming inconsistently that sometimes phlogiston had mass and sometimes it did not.
Lavoisier countered their arguments with clarity, stating:
"Either it has mass, and you are wrong due to this evidence I presented, or it does not, and you are attempting to attribute a phenomenon to something that may never be proven while ignoring the tangible evidence before you."
This effectively put phlogiston theory on life support. Lavoisier also developed a new vocabulary for chemistry that lacked any reference to phlogiston. For instance, the term "calx of zinc" was replaced with "zinc oxide," a name that accurately reflects the chemical reaction taking place.
Ultimately, Lavoisier was the first to:
- Recognize that gases were true elements
- Accurately interpret the results of hydrogen combustion
- Dispel the phlogiston theory
- Elevate chemistry as a legitimate science, pulling it from the shadows
- Establish modern chemical terminology
- Host memorable chemistry gatherings
These achievements, all stemming from a simple chemical reaction, are nothing short of remarkable.
In the first video, "Debunking 10 Common Myths About Chemists," the content explores and clarifies widespread misconceptions about the field of chemistry and its practitioners.
The second video, "Fact-Checking James Tour's Embarrassing Debate Performance," critically analyzes a high-profile debate in chemistry, aiming to clarify misunderstandings and misrepresentations.