Chapter 1: Introduction to Steve Bassett's Perspective

Steve Bassett is recognized as a uniquely optimistic figure in the field of UFO studies. His approach sets him apart from many of his peers. Often appearing on various podcasts, he is less frequently seen in traditional media interviews. In a recent podcast, he addresses the political nuances surrounding the imminent disclosure of UFOs, offering a perspective that is both hopeful and logical. He introduced the term 'Truth Embargo,' which he believes is a more constructive alternative to the phrase 'UFO Cover Up.' By encouraging those with knowledge to come forward, he believes humanity can advance collectively. The time has come for everyone to understand that we are not alone in the universe.

It is evident to those who pay attention that since 2017, society has made more progress toward understanding UFOs than it has since 1947. A 2021 article from the Washington Post suggested that it was time to end the fascination with UFOs. This plea highlighted the author's own hysteria, as it associated UFOs with irrationality while failing to recognize his own overreactions. The reality that humans are not solitary beings in the cosmos—and perhaps not even on Earth—will soon be common knowledge.

Science does not react with anger; it evaluates, questions, and seeks understanding. The concerns of a misinformed science writer cannot overshadow the congressional hearings on UFOs, testimonies from whistleblowers, and military representatives openly discussing extraterrestrial life, such as Senator Tim Burchett’s direct acknowledgments.

Chapter 2: The Nature of Extraterrestrial Existence

The notion of an alien presence may seem bizarre, yet it is only the beginning of a broader narrative. Scientists, including Heisenberg, have famously stated that the universe is not only stranger than we imagine but also beyond our comprehension. While Carl Sagan’s assertion that 'extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence' still holds, it is crucial to recognize that evidence can exist beyond our current intellectual grasp.

From the late John Leer and various UFO abductees, there are claims ranging from encounters with Light Beings to theories suggesting that evolution is part of a grand cosmic plan. Rather than being random, evolution might be a collaborative process between humanity and the universe aimed at fostering a more compassionate and resilient species.

Chapter 3: The Academic Response to UFO Phenomena

Perhaps the perplexing nature of these phenomena has led the academic community to withdraw from exploring these topics. This interpretation is more generous than suggesting they are complicit in a 'Truth Embargo,' which contradicts Neil deGrasse Tyson’s assertion that 'science is indifferent to feelings.' Science must either be committed to uncovering truth or it risks losing its credibility.

While many perceive a schism between science and spirituality, they actually share high ethical standards that align them closely. If the universe exceeds our understanding, we must expand our thinking beyond binary perspectives. Pioneers like Michael Newton, Delores Cannon, and Carl Jung have explored the unconscious and interacted with what seem to be sentient beings, encompassing a spectrum of cultural beliefs. It is clear that humanity has never truly been alone.

Observing the remarkable complexity of life forms in nature reinforces this truth. To believe that contemporary humans surpass our ancestors in intelligence is to overlook history. Somewhere along the way, we lost our collective memory, hope for a brighter future, and the certainty of cohabitation with other beings on this planet.

As we move forward, perhaps the acknowledgment of our place in the cosmos will enable us to cultivate more meaningful relationships with both each other and non-human entities. The true danger of UFOs lies not in what we know but in what we have yet to comprehend. Preparing for the unexpected is inherently challenging; it requires us to confront the unknown.

Eric Haseltine, Ph.D., argues in Psychology Today that the perceived danger of UFOs is misplaced. However, I contend that his perspective still clings to the outdated belief that knowledge of extraterrestrials would be harmful. Steve Bassett, in the referenced interview, robustly challenges this misconception, arguing that the idea that disclosure would be detrimental is misguided.

In this enlightening discussion, Bassett highlights the irony that while blockbuster films about UFOs and aliens generate billions for Hollywood, UFO documentaries tend to underperform. The persistent interest in aliens starkly contrasts with the lack of success of UFO-centric documentaries, which raises questions about the motives behind this disparity.

There have been concerted efforts to stifle awareness of UFOs and extraterrestrial life. This suppression may not be malicious but stems from a belief among some that society is unprepared for such revelations. Bassett recounts how the producers of "Independence Day" faced pressure from the military to eliminate references to Area 51. Thankfully, the producer stood firm against this request.

This historical context of resistance extends to other filmmakers, such as Steven Spielberg, who was advised by NASA against producing "E.T." The rationale behind such opposition raises significant questions: Why would governmental agencies resist fictional portrayals of aliens? Could it be linked to the reluctance of military contractors to disclose their findings and the implications of advanced technology?

If this isn’t a form of disclosure, what is? With the ongoing revelations about congressional involvement and military practices, it's clear that the public now recognizes the depth of knowledge held by these institutions.

The truth is out there, and as awareness grows, the world increasingly understands the implications. There may be nations, like Russia or China, eager to assert their leadership on this front. If they disclose the existence of extraterrestrials before the United States, the consequences for American credibility could be dire.

The narrative is already being foreshadowed in popular culture, as seen in the series "Firefly," which intertwines English and Chinese languages. If the U.S. fails to act decisively, other nations may take the lead in the realm of space exploration and alien affairs.

Ultimately, the only viable course of action is full disclosure. Bassett is optimistic that this will occur soon, although I personally harbor doubts about whether President Biden will take on this role. Yet, given the current challenges he faces, he might be well-positioned to lead this charge.

If he were to announce the reality of aliens and share evidence of extraterrestrial encounters, the government could quickly distance itself from his claims, citing his age as a factor in discrediting him. This mirrors the media's treatment of former Israeli Space Defense Minister Haim Eshed, who faced skepticism due to his age after making similar assertions.

As the global landscape shifts, if another country validates an alien presence and provides proof, it could reflect poorly on U.S. credibility. Given the number of global conflicts and deteriorating infrastructure within the U.S., the public will likely question our alliances with these extraterrestrial entities—be they benevolent, malevolent, or something entirely different.

The potential for psychological distress regarding the existence of aliens may not stem from the mere fact of their existence but rather from the realization of their diverse nature. Most people will likely respond with laughter, acknowledging their prior awareness and demanding more information about these beings. Such revelations could lead to a reality show that eclipses even the most popular entertainment.

The Danger of UFOs Is Not What You Think