Chapter 1: Understanding Sentience and Love

When we discuss life, we are ultimately referring to the essence of sentience. Similarly, when we express love, we are truly speaking about understanding. Zen Master Thich Nhat Hanh eloquently states, "To love is to recognize; to be loved is to be recognized by the other." Love, then, is fundamentally about recognizing and comprehending the beloved. In this light, sentience can be equated with love.

As individuals who seek meaning, we often find ourselves grappling with the essence of existence and what it truly means to be alive. The passing of a dear friend due to suicide has profoundly influenced my contemplation of sentience. Long before this tragic event, I remember lying awake as a child, consumed by the fear of losing my parents. Today, I see my father battling dementia in a care facility—an unsettling realization of those childhood fears.

Experiencing a nightmare often reveals that facing our deepest fears can be more distressing than we anticipated, yet it also becomes a mundane aspect of life. Death, while universally feared, is an intrinsic part of existence, mirroring the miracle of birth. Suffering is an inevitable part of being alive, while joy serves as a fleeting respite from our common struggles. Without suffering, joy loses its significance; similarly, joy is often shadowed by pain. The cosmos, with its dark voids, is illuminated by the explosive births and deaths of stars.

When contemplating death, our worries are not solely about the concept itself but about the inevitable loss of our intricate and beautiful bodies—the very vessels through which we experience the world. We fear the cessation of our bodily functions, the fading of our senses, and ultimately, the dimming of consciousness.

This pervasive fear reflects our concern about losing everything familiar. Upon my passing, I won't be able to articulate these thoughts or feelings. This existential dread is inherent in all living beings, as we each exist solely within our own experiences.

To cope with these profound fears, humanity has crafted religions, developing intricate symbols and rituals that have evolved over centuries into powerful cultural narratives. Interestingly, while religions often invoke the fear of demons lurking in the unknown, they themselves can become overwhelming entities, consuming the essence of human experience.

But what exactly is a soul? Most people approach this concept from a flawed perspective, asking, "What is a soul?" Before answering, we must first clarify its definition. Many envision the soul as a flickering light within us, tossed between divine and demonic forces. We desire to believe in our uniqueness, viewing ourselves as cherished creations, but our significance lies not in our motherhood but in our shared humanity. We are remarkable simply because we exist, live, and interact. Our survival hinges on countless interdependent relationships, akin to the collective behaviors of amoebas or jellyfish.

So, is a soul a tangible reality? Objectively, it seems not. There is no empirical evidence supporting the existence of a soul or any ethereal entity within us. Yet, this comforting myth persists—if our physical forms perish, perhaps our "light bodies" endure. This belief provides solace until we contemplate the implications of an immortal soul.

Consider the concept of eternity; it could resemble an interminably dull meeting. Whether in Viking Valhalla or Christian Heaven, after eons, even the most divine experiences might become tiresome.

Many believers shy away from such reflections, as faith often discourages critical thinking. Unlike science, which thrives on inquiry and peer review, many religious doctrines can become stagnant, offering comfort at the expense of deeper understanding.

What if we embraced the notion that life's experiences encompass both joy and suffering? History reveals that countless ancestors endured immense hardship and suffering, a stark contrast to our modern curated culture, which often distracts us from uncomfortable truths.

By employing our reasoning and the insights of science, we can discern that the notion of a soul lacks substantiation. The evidence from human existence does not support the hypothesis of a soul, and without it, many religious frameworks crumble, as they rely heavily on this concept to sustain their beliefs. The dichotomy between curiosity—fueling scientific exploration—and dogma—restricting religious inquiry—becomes evident.

This is why curiosity and the pursuit of knowledge are often met with resistance from religious institutions. To cultivate blind followers, questioning their dogma is undesirable. The scientific method, championing objectivity and rigorous inquiry, stands in stark contrast to religious dogma.

So, what is sentience without the notion of a soul? Is consciousness merely our brain's interpretation of the universe? The term "merely" reflects our tendency to dismiss the wonders of our own biology. When we scrutinize our bodies—how interconnected they are with the environment—we might discover far more captivating concepts than the outdated notion of a soul, which serves as a mere placeholder for the unknown. What if souls do exist, but they encompass galaxies, with each of us playing a minuscule role within them? To explore new ideas rigorously, we must let go of antiquated beliefs.

If a soul were to exist, what would it entail? Those with religious convictions often resist examining the material reality behind their beliefs, yet in our universe, as far as we can ascertain, everything exists within the natural world. Some may label this perspective as scientific materialism, suggesting that consciousness and perception are diminished to mere matter. The challenge lies in understanding how perception shapes our reality, as we can only utilize perception to explore physics.

Is it mere coincidence that powerful religions emerged alongside our expanding understanding of the cosmos, or did they evolve as divergent branches of our sentience? One path clings to old dogmas, while the other embraces curiosity to explore the physical universe. Which approach do you believe will ultimately prevail?

If you found this exploration intriguing, please hit 👏👏👏 and follow me! Your support helps me know you appreciate this content and aids others in discovering it. Thank you for reading!

Chapter 2: Curiosity and Religion

In the context of curiosity and its relationship to religion, we can examine how our innate desire to understand the universe often clashes with established dogmas.

The first video titled "Sep 22 - Homily - Fr Dominic: Curiosity Killed the Herod" delves into the role of curiosity in understanding faith, and how it can be both a blessing and a challenge.

The second video, "Curiosity Killed the Cat | Peter Tromba | TEDxYouth@FranklinSchoolOfInnovation," further explores the implications of curiosity in our lives and how it shapes our understanding of ourselves and the world around us.